Marching on Chevron
GREEN CITY: Activists from Global Exchange protest alleged human rights abuses and environmental devastation

news@sfbg.com

GREEN CITY Although the 250-seat Roxie Theater auditorium was filled to capacity for the Nov. 1 screening of the controversial film "The Yes Men Fix the World," the real action took place on the city's streets when audience members took the film's anticorporate message directly to an oil giant's door.

Activists from Global Exchange co-organized the San Francisco film premiere to protest alleged human rights abuses and environmental devastation by Chevron Corporation, California's largest corporation and the fifth largest in the world. The theatrical protest followed the film and ran from 16th Street to a Chevron station at Market and Castro streets.

Antonia Juhasz, director of Global Exchange's Chevron Program, introduced the film, riling up the crowd when she said, "After viewing this film, we will be so inspired we won't know what to do with ourselves. But we need to take this energy and direct it toward affecting change."

The film chronicles the exploits of "Yes Men" Andy Bichlbaum and Mike Bonanno, following the pair as they perform various publicity stunts in an attempt to illustrate the greed and corruption of the free-market system and draw attention to their progressive causes.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T


Currently being sued by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for recently staging a fake press conference on global warming, the duo have been called world-renowned troublemakers because of antics like announcing live on BBC that the Dow Chemical Company would finally clean up the site of the Bhopal, India, gas leak and compensate the victims.

Although the film does not directly reference Chevron, it aspires to hold corporations accountable for impacts to the communities they operate in. Juhasz said that although Chevron spends billions of dollars on advertising campaigns, it operates with blatant disregard for the environment.

Chevron spends less than 3 percent of its expenditures on alternative energy, operates a coal company, and is among the world's largest corporate contributors to global warming, she said.

"We want to link communities in the struggle against this corporation, demanding policy changes and building pressure where Chevron operates," Juhasz said. "By targeting one company, the whole industry is affected and eventually energy policies can be changed."

The procession was led by protestors dressed as Chevron officials, cleaners, and absurd imaginary products. "Today we are demonstrating what Chevron is actually doing," said Rae Abileah, grassroots coordinator for CodePink, the antiwar group that participated in the event. "We are just showing what a mockery this all is and that we can rise up as people to transform our world."

As "I Will Survive" blared from speakers, the procession had a party-like atmosphere that attracted bystanders. Larry Bogad, an associate professor at UC Davis, came up with the concept and told us that "by using surprise, humor, imagination, and protest to engage people, we can stimulate thought and draw a deeper and wider attention to the issue."

For David Solnit, organizer with the Mobilization for Climate Justice, the unusual nature of the event was exactly what made it so effective. "We are taking a popular film ...

Read more... Page: 1 | 2

( 6 comments | Comment on this article )
gaiuslove on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 at 07:13 AM
I'm really grateful this stuff is going on in the world. Life does really progress afterall...I hope I live to see the say when oil is nomore or very little.

Gaius
Outfoxed on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 at 10:00 AM
I am sorry, but is the "billions" in advertising a public fact? Please confirm your source because this seems like overstated muckraking to me and illustrates what you DON'T KNOW about business costs. Because of your article, I went to the Chevron site to understand what you claim. I am not employed by Chevron or the industry, but its clear Chevron makes it money from UPSTREAM (exploration and production)and is actively selling off or realigning DOWNSTREAM (refining, MARKETING, transportation)operations. Where is this validity of your article or purpose? This information is stated in the public records and company profile on Chevron.com Unfortunately, your article makes me disbelieve YOU more than Chevron - I am left with a plea for you to get your facts right before you recruit.
Outfoxed on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 at 10:24 AM
I am sorry, but is the "billions" in advertising a public fact? Please confirm your source because this seems like overstated muckraking to me and illustrates what you DON'T KNOW about business costs. Because of your article, I went to the Chevron site to understand what you claim. I am not employed by Chevron or the industry, but its clear Chevron makes it money from UPSTREAM (exploration and production)and is actively selling off or realigning DOWNSTREAM (refining, MARKETING, transportation)operations. Where is this validity of your article or purpose? This information is stated in the public records and company profile on Chevron.com Unfortunately, your article makes me disbelieve YOU more than Chevron - I am left with a plea for you to get your facts right before you recruit.
Outfoxed on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 at 10:33 AM
I am sorry, but is the "billions" in advertising a public fact? Please confirm your source because this seems like overstated muckraking to me and illustrates what you DON'T KNOW about business costs. Because of your article, I went to the Chevron site to understand what you claim. I am not employed by Chevron or the industry, but its clear Chevron makes it money from UPSTREAM (exploration and production)and is actively selling off or realigning DOWNSTREAM (refining, MARKETING, transportation)operations. Where is this validity of your article or purpose? This information is stated in the public records and company profile on Chevron.com Unfortunately, your article makes me disbelieve YOU more than Chevron - I am left with a plea for you to get your facts right before you recruit.
Sheriffsposse on Thursday, November 5, 2009 at 08:41 AM
While I agree, Oil Cos have done some significant damage around the world; such as in Montana where gas wells have fully contaminated many peoples water wells, folks need to realize where a barrel of oil goes. I always wondered this myself until I watch a Science Channel episode on just that. Only 28% of a barrel goes to fuel for cars, boats, trucks, trains, airplanes, etc. Yet, 37% goes directly to plastics. The rest is for pesticides, make-up/cosmetics (and we wonder why cancer rate of woman has skyrocketed), fertilizers, industrial, etc. So, if we want to end our dependence on oil, we need to attack the use of plastics which includes; general plastics, nylon, vinyls, carbon filament, etc. I just don't see that happening. Odd how the focus is on alternative fuels, while the plastics industry has sat quietly in the back of the room.
adse0123 on Sunday, November 8, 2009 at 08:35 PM
When the protagonists of a supposedly good cause get this desperate and resort to falsehood, the intent can be anything but altruistic.

Comment on: Marching on Chevron

In order to comment on an article, you must Log In.

SFBG Classifieds